PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE

 

modes of arguments

ABSTRACT

This article is an introduction of the usage of arguments and the language in which those arguments are made. An argument is a proposition and a reason for it. And argumentation is AN interchange involving 2 or additional parties leading to the assertion of 1 or additional arguments including anticipated or actual crucial responses. It explores two main objectives.  Justify and explain. Arguments are made up of language. Different nations of the world speak different types of languages. We must also know his language in order to understand their arguments. So we cannot understand arguments without first understanding language. Language should be understood, emphasizing their main ideas. 

Keywords: argument, argumentation, Justify, explanation

 

1. Introduction

An argument is a proposition and a reason for it. It explores two main objectives.  Justification and explanation. Argument tells him what causes the other to believe what one believes.  All reasons include weighing and evaluating.  Arguments do not serve only one person. Arguments are created from language; therefore, we have a tendency to cannot perceive arguments while not 1st understanding language. disputation is one in all the various things that we will do with words. to know however arguments work, then, it's crucial to know however language works. Still, sure facts concerning language are on the far side dispute, and recognizing them can give a background for understanding however arguments work.

2. ARGUMENT

2.1 Justification and explanation

The purpose of justification is not to convince anyone else, but still uses logic to find a good reason to believe the conclusion. In such cases, we can say that the argument is used for unbiased standard justification. The justification is that the goal is usually to find a good cause.  It is impartial, what is sought is a good cause or a cause to be accepted, and the cap on embracing this argument regardless of who they are.  The purpose is Show that whoever has reason to believe the conclusion has reason to believe it.  Other arguments, in contrast, are aimed at appealing to specific people, and the goal is to show that those people are committed. There is reason to believe the conclusion or conclusion. 

Any event can be explained by quoting from established principles and accepted facts. This argument has the following form:

1.       General principles or rules

2.       A statement of initial conditions

3.       Therefore, a statement of the phenomenon to be explained.

Sooner or later the explanation comes to an end.  It is the task of science to move that limit further and to all logical inquiries.  But while there is much more to explain, it does not show that a partial explanation is completely useless.  As we have seen, explanations can be useful even when they are incomplete and are not used to justify a controversial statement.  Thus the explanation is a separate argument.

2.2 The language of argument

Arguments do not serve only one person. Arguments are made up of language, so we cannot understand arguments without our first understanding language. Arguing is one of the many things that we can do with our words. Language should be understood, emphasizing their main ideas. While it is important to understand that language is traditional, it is also important not to misunderstand this fact. Given that language is traditional, it is easy to conclude that language is completely arbitrary.  If the language is completely arbitrary, it seems that it does not really matter what words we use or how we put them together.  This view, no matter how courageous it may seem, needs a little thought to see if it misrepresents the role of language conventions.

There are different ways of connecting sentences to formulate arguments.  Here many applications are used to introduce an argument structure to language by marking reasons or conclusions.  These are called logic.  I would like to mention them in Table 1. These words are not always used as arguments.  Because some of these verses have different meanings, argument markers cannot be identified just by looking at the words.  In the analysis of arguments, a great deal of attention is paid to these argument markers. When we read or listen, whether it be philosophical writings, news, stories, lectures and conversation. It is important to compare difference between arguments and other language that is not inferential.

Table 1 Terms which are used to introduce an argumentative structure into language by making either reasons or conclusion.

Reason Markers	Conclusion Markers
Since	Therefore
Because	Hence
For	Thus
As	Then
Whereas	Consequently

 

4. CONCLUSION

Argument have many uses and it is really appropriate to define ‘argument’ without mentioning any particular usage. Finally, I can say, arguments can be easily identified using argument markers.

REFERENCES

[1]    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/315863714_Argument_and_Its_Uses_OSSA_2005_Keynote_Address

[2]    https://courses.lumenlearning.com/atd-pima-philosophy/chapter/1-1-arguments-the-basics