scientific explanation
ABSTRACT
We have good, scientific explanations for most of what
we see in the natural world. A scientific explanation uses observations and
measurements to explain what we see in the natural world. Science is the study of alternatives
Explanations. Is an explanation the answer to the question of why it happens? Therefore
a scientific explanation should make a claim about the problem, provide
evidence for the claim and provide reasoning that links the evidence to the
claim. In this article, I hope to present scientific explanations logically
through evidence. Scientific
explanations should be as consistent with the evidence as possible.
Keywords: science, explanation, claim, reasoning, evidence
1. Introduction
Scientific explanations for the problems have been around
since pre-Socratic times. However, modern discussion actually begins with the
developmental reduction-nominal model. That was the premise of a recent
discussion science sometimes provides explanations. The task of a
"theoretician" or "model" of scientific explanation is to
characterize the structure of such explanations. Philosophical literature assumes that there
is a significant continuity between the explanations found in science and some
explanations found in general, non-scientific contexts. Therefore theories
cannot be proven, but one can definitely disprove them.
Mainly a good scientific explanation should explain all the
observations and data we have and it should allow us to make predictions that
can be tested using future experiments. An example is 'Why is the sky
blue?' It’s all about light
scattering. The scientific explanation
for this is that we receive white light from the sun, which fills the Earth's
atmosphere. So the sky is blue. Most of the light that travels above
continues to travel and never reaches our eyes.
But some of it is scattered by air molecules and jumps into our eyes. The sky looks blue to us because blue light
diffuses better than any other color.
2. TYPES OF explanation
An explanation is a set of statements usually made to
describe a set of facts that explain the causes, context, and consequences of
those facts. This description may
establish rules or regulations, and may explain existing laws regarding any
objector phenomenon being examined.
Also, the explanation may or may not be scientific. Non-scientific explanations
suggest supernatural phenomena and non-scientific explanations based on belief.
A scientific explanation is a way of explaining something we see in the
natural world that’s based on observations and measurements.
2.1
Explanation
vs. Confirmation
Scientific explanations should match the evidence and be
logical, or they should at least match as much of the evidence as possible. The
term confirmation is used in epistemology and the philosophy of science
whenever observational data and other information that is taken for granted
speak in favor of or support scientific theories and everyday hypotheses.
Confirmation is the giving of reasons to believe that
certain statements (scientific theories) are true. The first step in explaining
the concept of scientific explanation is to make a sharp distinction between
explaining why a phenomenon occurs and giving reasons for believing that it
does occur.
2.2
Parts of the scientific explanation
A claim, evidence, and reasoning (CER) is a scientific
explanation. It is a way that we explain our evidence-based claims. This process shows in figure1.
o
Claim: answers the question
o
Evidence: has at least 2 pieces of
evidence that supports the claim
o
Reasoning: explains how the evidence
supports the claim
3. CONCLUSION
A scientific explanation is the final claim of the scientist
made upon analyzing the experiment data (evidence). Scientific explanations
should match the evidence and be logical or they should at least match as much
of the evidence as possible.
REFERENCES
[1]
https://study.com/academy/lesson/scientific-explanation-definition-examples.html
[2] How to Write a Scientific Explanation - YouTube
[3] Scientific Explanation | Encyclopedia.com